← Founder Notes
Archive

The frozen lake is now being asked to keep its own calendar

Yethikrishna ROriginal on Threads

the frozen lake is now being asked to keep its own calendar: a random forest reads multi sensor satellite data and hits 94 percent accuracy on ice state across 31,000 thermokarst lakes on the alaska north slope, deep learning reconstructs ice on and ice off for minnesota lakes from 1980 to 2018 with lake specific estimates, and a tiny network segments sea ice on board an fpga with low power.

the lake now files its own freeze diary.

Context

The thermokarst lake study is an EGUsphere preprint, Multi-sensor satellite analysis reveals latitudinal and morphometric controls on ice phenology across 31,000 thermokarst lakes on the Alaska North Slope (2026). It uses Sentinel-1 SAR classified by a random forest trained on Sentinel-2 optical imagery and ERA5 temperature for 2019 to 2023, with 94% accuracy for ice state, phenology retrieved for 97% of lakes and a mean ice-free period of 115 days.

The Minnesota work is a USGS data release and paper, Predicting Minnesota lake ice phenology with deep learning, explainable methods, and a physically based benchmark, 1980-2018. The data release says it hindcasts ice phenology from daily weather drivers and lake ice records across 625 Minnesota lakes (4,359 lake-years) and provides LSTM predictions for 881 lakes. The FPGA network is TinyIceNet (arXiv 2603.03075), a compact segmentation network for on-board Stage of Development sea ice mapping from Sentinel-1 SAR under strict power constraints.

How it compares

The 94% accuracy is for ice state classification and the 97% is the share of lakes with a retrieved phenology, two different figures. It is a preprint. The Minnesota model is trained on 625 lakes with records and predicts for 881, so lake specific estimates for unmonitored lakes come from the model and not from observations. TinyIceNet maps sea ice stage of development, which is close to but not the same as segmenting sea ice. The excerpt read gives no power figure in watts, so none is claimed.

Watch next

  • TinyIceNet power and accuracy figures. Minnesota model error on lakes it was not trained on.

Sources

  1. Multi-sensor satellite analysis reveals latitudinal and morphometric controls on ice phenology across 31,000 thermokarst lakes on the Alaska North Slope (EGUsphere)egusphere.copernicus.org
  2. Model application: modeling lake ice phenology in Minnesota, 1980-2018 (USGS)usgs.gov
  3. Predicting Minnesota lake ice phenology with deep learning, explainable methods, and a physically based benchmark (USGS)pubs.usgs.gov
  4. TinyIceNet: Low-Power SAR Sea Ice Segmentation for On-Board FPGA Inference (arXiv 2603.03075)arxiv.org

Provenance

The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 4 October 2026 at 09:06 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.

View the original post
Embed this note
<iframe src="https://founder.myndlabs.tech/notes/embed/the-frozen-lake-is-now-being-asked-to-DeDrvn7iOLL" width="480" height="420" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="The frozen lake is now being asked to keep its own calendar"></iframe>

More notes