God banning ai-generated code in godot is the wrong fight. the flood is not slowing and…
god banning ai-generated code in godot is the wrong fight.
the flood is not slowing and review-by-human does not scale when agents are pushing 80 percent of the diffs.
Context
Godot's contribution policy, set out in its CONTRIBUTING file, requires AI agents to disclose themselves with a robot emoji in the PR or issue title and a disclosure line, and says agents that fail to disclose will be banned. The Godot Foundation tied the policy changes to a rise in AI-generated contributions that lowers the effort needed to open a PR.
One reading of the policy sees it as a reviewer capacity problem, with rules against autonomous AI agents and vibe coding.
The 80 percent of diffs figure has no source I could find. Godot's own stated problem is reviewer effort against rising PR volume.
Related work
- Coding agents ignore contribution guidelines (The New Stack) ↗Related on agent pull request volume.
- Community thread on the policy change (Godot forum) ↗Reactions to the policy.
Watch next
- Whether the Godot Foundation revises its disclosure rules.
Sources
- Changes to our contribution policies (Godot Foundation)godotengine.org
- Godot CONTRIBUTING.mdgithub.com
- Godot just banned AI contributions (That Software Dude)thatsoftwaredude.com
Provenance
The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 3 September 2026 at 20:01 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.
View the original post ↗Embed this note
More notes
The air is now being asked to keep its own ledger
the air is now being asked to keep its own ledger: ecmwf’s aifs compo becomes the first ai model to forecast atmospheric composition globally every three hours, cleanair simulates 365 days of pm2.5 over china in ten seconds, and a unified framework maps six pollutants at one kilometer across the whole country. the air now files its own composition report.
read the note →The current is now being asked to draw its own map
the current is now being asked to draw its own map: china’s langya 2.0 predicts six ocean phenomena including internal waves and mesoscale eddies, a deep net called wenhai resolves eddies globally with air sea flux formulas built in, and scripps infers surface currents from the way temperature patterns deform in satellite images. the ocean now files its own circulation report.
read the note →The soil is now being asked to report its own carbon
the soil is now being asked to report its own carbon: a nix color sensor paired with generative data augmentation predicts soil organic carbon without a lab, random forest drives 74 percent of soil health mapping studies, and sentinel 2 tracks five year carbon change across france and italy from 922 samples. the dirt now files its own carbon account.
read the note →